
...I'm really baffled sometimes by such attitudes. But thankfully there are enough wonderful human beings out there, who continue to make it a beautiful experience to share the fruit of my explorations with.
Here's why I don't make it open source:
1. Opportunists, who will try to make a commercial product out of it! Those might potentially have access to enough power and the drive to ruthlessly steal away access to such elemental tools for creative self expression and exploration from all those, who would otherwise not have the courage to even break into this field. Shot version: Really, really ugly people!
2. I am hoping to figure out some way for people to help me focus on creating and evolving future versions of Verve and possibly even more tools without extorting them to do so or depriving those, who either can't afford it or can't justify to experience their artistic powers by having to pay some fixed amount of money for it.
3. I may explore making some commercial mobile versions of it. I consider those gadgets as non-essential, a kind of luxury that is accustomed to paying small sums for apps and it would be a fair way for me to approach a business side whilst still holding true to my ideals (maintaining free desktop versions!)
And what on earth is it with bizarre labels? OPEN SOURCE = open source. FREE SOFTWARE = you don't have to pay to get the software. By precedence the word "free" is most often used for scams that provide "trial" versions and all that ugly deceit. In my case you actually get a software you can use and you don't have to pay for it.
Anyway, I'll have a look at what I wrote. It's good to know, if I can avoid having to face ungrateful behavior for no reason.
And what the hell do you care about what's going to happen "in the long run", honestly?! You can download it, use it and be happy now!
Be twice as happy, when a new version will come along. I won't ever come visit all of you at night and steal my software away from you?!?
